Land consolidation without irrigation is impossible to happen

One of the problems of Bulgarian land use is the rapid depopulation of the Bulgarian village and the lack of manpower in the agro-sector, said Stayko Staykov, Chairman of the Management Board of the Bulgarian Association of Agricultural Landowners.

Mr. Staykov, the Law on the Ownership and Use of Agricultural Land is again in the centre of attention because it is once again subject of additions and amendments. Does your organization have a position on the land legislation?

Right now I cannot comment on the legislation. We hope that, after our presidency of the Council of the European Union, when it becomes clear what the new rules in the Community will be, the new Land Law will be adopted. Non-governmental organizations and state commissions need to be assembled so that a workable law comes out. It is high time to summarize everything in the new Land Law. Making partial changes that we know can work at first but then will have a negative effect too is very superficial. So firstly, Europe has to make its long-term planning and to specify its budget, so that each farmer understands what he will get in the future and how to plan his investments. All branch organizations need to make suggestions to the Ministry of Agriculture and Food so that a workable law that includes problems such as land consolidation, irrigation and so on appears in the near future.

All this sounds good, but it looks a bit unreal. As we know, the new Land Law has fallen somewhere, and all parties in the Parliament continue to disguise the most rectified Law in Bulgaria – this on agricultural land. Do you see the deadline for the adoption of the new Land Law?

I think that after our presidency of the Council of the European Union, the government and the farmers in Bulgaria will have a clear idea of what will happen in long-terms. This would allow us to work faster, but things depend on the decision-makers. I know that all branch organizations will support the process in any way because everyone wants to know how to plan their future investments in agriculture.

However, the first version of the Land Pandect has received a lot of criticism from farmers. How will this change in the next project?

We made an offer to the administration to form working groups with broad participation of the branch organizations. It isn’t a coincidence that at the regional forum in Sofia for the Future of Agriculture we invited the representatives of the big branch unions, including the European Organization of Land Owners (ELO). Our future goal is to solve the problems in agriculture together, as they do in other European countries. It is clear to everyone that both this and the next programming period will be closely linked to environmental protection measures as well as to the implementation of sustainable agriculture. This should guide us in the legislative regulation of the land market.

When a group for the preparation of the new Land Law will be established?

I suppose we could work actively on this document from the middle of 2018, when our Presidency of the Council of European Union is over. Then we will know what we have to do, because it is pointless to prepare a new Code, as we do not know the conditions which the European Union will develop after 2020. You know that land consolidation without irrigation is impossible. From our five pilot projects that the association has been implementing so far, it is clear that the effect is good. But it must be promoted through state policy. That is why we will wait for the new legislation from Brussels in order to know in which direction to work and together with the state to create a working document that will operate for at least 10 years. We cannot constantly make changes in Bulgaria.

China is becoming a big economic partner of ours. Recently, the Executive Director of the Bulgarian Investment Agency, Stamen Yankov, said that it is difficult to say how much land Chinese investors have in Bulgaria, but admitted that they possess land all over the country. Do you have any data on how many Bulgarian agricultural lands have been bought by Chinese so far?

In my opinion, the Chinese do not invest in Bulgarian land. There is one company that is said to be Chinese, but the amount of Chinese investor’s property is very small and I cannot comment on it. I think that with this fragmentation of the agricultural land, even the Chinese have no interest in buying it. However, as Stamen Yankov himself mentioned, there is a forage factory in Dobrich, lands in Northwestern Bulgaria, as well as in southern Bulgaria. An investor or a group of investors created a farm near Vidin and presented the projects in public space. These are the same investors in southern Bulgaria, but they have reduced many of their holdings after dropping agro-environmental measures. There is no problem with the Chinese, moreover they cannot buy farmland by law now. This is by law, but in fact all foreigners who want to buy do it through companies.

In my opinion, there is currently no boom of Chinese investors looking for farmland in Bulgaria. They invest in other industries where they have greater security at this time. There is interest in the Bulgarian land, but every big investor who comes here face up with the problem of land fragmentation. Even our association with agricultural land funds cannot respond to this demand, because if consolidated land is found, there will be no irrigation. That’s why no one will risk to invest here.

Is there speculation with the purchase of land by foreigners because many Russians, even Arabs, have already bought agricultural land?

Very often they rent land, which is not illegal, or participate in Bulgarian companies. We are fighting for this – for more and more investors in Bulgaria because they are the people who will open additional work places. There is no industry in the country that is developing and does not involve foreign investments.

Is there exaggeration of the ban on the purchase of agricultural land by foreigners?

Even now there is a criminal procedure against Bulgaria and this is the subject. Negotiations with the European Commission are going aiming to alleviate the regime in the four countries threatened by Brussels to be sanctioned because of the ban on sale of agricultural land to foreigners. We are European communities that have a common budget and legislation, so there must be present all the conditions for Europeans to invest in agricultural land in our country.

Which are the three biggest problems of the Bulgarian agricultural land use?

The first problem is the land consolidation, the second is irrigation, and they cover a lot of the other problems because the consolidation comprises all the problems of land ownership and agriculture. The third may be the rapid depopulation of the Bulgarian village. We have to get people back in the villages somehow. This will happen if the land is consolidated and can bring farmers enough income. When there is good irrigation and facilities, and young people can earn their livelihood, they will return to agribusiness there. The consolidation also includes changes in the infrastructure. In the villages even the roads are destroyed by heavy machinery.

Does not this mean a radical change in the policy that has been taken so far? Recently, the Institute for Market Economics has reported that Plovdiv has as many work places as there are in North Bulgaria for a year. Concentration is present. How will the trend reverse?

In my opinion, the real problem is how to keep the educated and working young people in Bulgaria because there is labor shortage in agriculture everywhere. The conditions in Europe are much better and that is why other European countries naturally pull our staff. For example, Plovdiv and Sofia are a springboard for Western Europe. But while the standards in Sofia and Plovdiv are much higher, in the former regional cities the population is diminishing twice. Perhaps an exception is made by Varna, Bourgas and the Black Sea Coast because of the tourism. But there’s also an outflow of intellect. I still believe that many people with good education and skills gained in Europe will return to Bulgaria.

What kind of steps can be taken to make this happen or at least how to prevent a large part the young people from leaving our country?

The idea of ​​our Presidency of the Council of the European Union is to discuss precisely these things. We know that Europe will allocate much more funds to Bulgaria for agriculture and infrastructure next year. If this money is properly assimilated, they will lead to investment and the establishment of more new work positions. Personally, I believe that with a higher standard and better conditions, Bulgarians will remain in Bulgaria.

Does it mean that you are optimistic for the coming years?

As we are here in Bulgaria and invest here, we are optimistic. I believe that it is good to attract foreign investors as well, because if there is communication and competition there is development in every field, not only in agriculture.

Do you expect any movement in agricultural land prices?

At this point, there is between 5% and 10% growth in prices on an annual basis. In recent years, there is not much offering , as well as not big demand, and no big deviations. The only difference is in plots for permanent plantation. Larger plots around 500 decares are sought and such deals are made by direct negotiations. According to the region – whether it is in the North or South Bulgaria, whether it is being watered, I think next year the price increase will continue, but I do not see any stress or some huge investor to come in Bulgaria. We should not be mistaken that any kind of land is being bought at the moment. People, who are looking to buy, want consolidated piece of land in order to invest permanently. At present, our land is fragmented. In southern Bulgaria the average plot is not more than 6 decares – 7 decares, in the north is about 10 decares and the partition between the heirs continues. According to our association, the problem of land consolidation is current and should be commented on and worked on it. Being said about the land consolidation, it is also necessary to think about the irrigation problem. I think any bigger farmer who invests in the future will face this problem as much as we as an association at the beginning have announced that we are doing a consolidation projects. Now, farmers have become large owners and want their plots to be replenished. The goal is if at one point they decide to sell the farm, they will sell a whole business, not only pure agricultural land.

And what happened to the World Bank’s irrigation strategy in Bulgaria?

It had to have started long time ago, but that should be commented on by the government.



Source: fermera.bg

Stayko Staykov: The working process on the new Land Law should be started by the middle of 2018

Since 2008, the European Organization of Land Owners (ELO) has held annual forums in different European countries in order to combine agricultural land development and management strategies with agricultural policies. This year, the regional forum took place in Sofia and it was attended by the Bulgarian Association of Agricultural Landowners, the National Association of Bulgarian Black Sea Coast, the National Association of Grain Producers, the Association of Agricultural Producers in Bulgaria and many others.

For sinor.bg the Chairman of the Bulgarian Association of the Landowners Stayko Staykov represented the goals that the sector has set in relation to the future European agricultural policy after 2020.

Mr. Staykov, what are your expectations from this forum and how will the future Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) help for the proper management of the agricultural land?

The Forum “Future for Agriculture” is organized for the first time in Bulgaria. The organizer is the sole and largest European organization of landowners ELO, whose members are two non-governmental organizations in Bulgaria – the Association of Agricultural Landowners and the National Association “Bulgarian Black Sea Coast”.

The specific thing about ELO is that it works both for the land ownership regulation and its proper use, so that the interests of both parties – owners and processors – are protected. If agricultural land is not well managed, we cannot get a high added value and protect this valuable asset.

The fact that together with our colleagues from the Association of the Bulgarian Black Sea Coast we are members of this organization means a lot to us because we can set our clocks with Europe and quickly solve the actual problems related to the agricultural land.

It is not accidental that our forum coincides with the date when the European Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development Phil Hogan presented his report on the future Common Agricultural Policy. This report is essential because when we have information about the guidelines that the sector is about to reform, then we will be able to build our new policies at national level.

In this regard, the new Land Pandect is an important document that we still need to work on and on which we have to plan our investments in the future. It is important to attract foreign investors in this regard, but at the same time it is important to work hard for the preservation of Bulgarian land.

The first version of the new Land Law was severely criticized by farmers. How will this change in the next project?

We made an offer to the administration to form working groups with broad participation of the branch organizations. It is not accidentally that we invited the representatives of the biggest branch organizations to this forum. Our future goal is to solve the problems in agriculture together, as they do in other European countries.

It is clear to everyone that this one and the next programming period will be closely linked to environmental protection measures and sustainable agriculture, and this should guide us in the legal regulation of the land market.

When will these working groups for the new Land Law be established?

I suppose we could work actively on this document only from the middle of 2018, when our Presidency of the Council of the European Union is over. Then we will know what we have to do, because it is pointless to prepare a new Code, not knowing the conditions under which the European Union will develop beyond 2020. Without these conditions, we cannot plan either when and how to begin the consolidation or the conditions for restoration of the irrigation systems.

You know that land consolidation without irrigation is impossible to take place. From our five pilot projects which have been implemented so far by the Association, it is clear that the effect is good. But this has to be promoted by state policy.

That is why we will wait for the new legislation from Brussels in order to know in which direction to work and together with the state to create a working document that will operate for at least 10 years. It is meaningless to make changes constantly piece by piece.

What are your views on the future Common Agricultural Policy with the expected lower budget?

Because of BREXIT there will be a reduction in the funds for agriculture, but in my opinion, if the money is properly targeting activities that bring a higher added value, even if it is less as a budget, it will have a good effect.

I believe that the Single Area Payment Scheme should remain for Bulgaria, because with the current structure of use, this is the most appropriate way of assisting. On the other hand, it is important to find a right approach and to support the lagging regions. You know that there are still desolate lands, so it is important to restore their functionality. The desolate areas occupy between 5 and 7 million decares, which is not a small amount taking into account the territory of our country.

We can not help thinking about irrigation, which was supposed to start in 2014, and at the same time seeking to develop the agricultural sector. There is no way for this to happen! Therefore, it is important to have subsidies for disadvantaged areas, because without this support we will return 10 years back when the land was 5 million decares less.

Has the demand for Bulgarian land by foreign investors resumed, such as the intentions of China, Turkey and the Arab countries?

This topic is very wide and the discussion on it is yet to go. There is interest in the Bulgarian land, but every big investor who comes to Bulgaria face up with the problem of fragmentation of the agricultural land. Even our association with agricultural land funds cannot respond to this demand, because if land is found, there will be no irrigation. And so no one will take the risk to invest.

Moreover, this topic is periodically speculated. Because when a big investor comes, he does not look for land under 10 thousand decares (a thousand hectares). In order to make his investment he has provided millions of euros and therefore he needs an area that is irrigated. But we know what the state of hydro-melioration is.

On the other hand, it is complicated by annual land consolidation settlements, because when you take a plot, but another investor appears, then the parcels will have to move and that is repelling any serious businessman. At present, the Land Use Law is applicable to land consolidation, but it is harmful if we are about to think of real land consolidation. That’s why it can not happen suddenly. In France, for example, it runs for over 50 years. The more we delay this process, the more problems appear in agriculture.

How, in your opinion, have to be restricted the abuses with land use in connection with the preemption of white spots?

The legislator says very well that whoever registers a company and has no history should not be allowed to use land that is not known to whom belongs. And I think that a lot of violations have to be criminalized in order to avoid such problems. The Commercial Law was also included, which states that when a company is transferred, the Parliament refused to give a 5-year statute of limitation, which corresponds to the former owner. Even if they are not 5 years, but 2 or 3, and if the company is efficient, the legislator has to decide it very easily in two or three steps. I believe that with the new Land Law, this can be regulated, as well as other problems such as the problem with the ideal parts and a number of other gaps that allow such frauds to happen.

All this leads to withdrawal of investors because they do not feel well protected. That is why the legislator has to solve this problem.

Source: sinor.bg